THE WARNING SIGN: DEEP STATE.
- S.S.TEJASKUMAR
- Oct 1, 2024
- 32 min read
The Deep State: A Low Probability but a Grave Threat to Nations
The concept of the "Deep State" refers to a network of unelected power-holders, including intelligence agencies, military officials, bureaucrats, and corporate elites, who manipulate or override democratic processes to serve their own interests. While the probability of a deep state existing in any given country might be as low as 1%, its presence, if confirmed, can have disastrous consequences for democracy, governance, and national sovereignty. This essay examines the theoretical underpinnings of the deep state, its implications, and historical examples supported by scientific research, testimonies, and scholarly analysis.
Understanding the Deep State: A Theoretical Perspective
The deep state concept has been explored in political science and governance theories, particularly concerning bureaucratic autonomy, elite influence, and institutional inertia. Michel Foucault (1975) in *Discipline and Punish* introduced the idea of decentralized power structures exerting control beyond visible government mechanisms. Similarly, C. Wright Mills (1956) in *The Power Elite* argued that military, corporate, and political elites shape national policies irrespective of electoral processes, forming an entrenched oligarchy.
Research by Peter Dale Scott (2015) in *The American Deep State* expands on this notion, highlighting how intelligence agencies, financial institutions, and security contractors influence geopolitics and domestic governance. His work suggests that the deep state operates through a combination of legal mechanisms (state secrecy laws, classified operations) and extralegal means (media control, covert actions, and policy manipulation).
Why the Deep State's Existence is Dangerous
Even if the probability of a deep state’s existence is minimal, its impact is profoundly detrimental. A state where unelected actors wield disproportionate power suffers from:
1. Democratic Erosion: The sidelining of elected representatives diminishes public trust in governance (Levitsky & Ziblatt, *How Democracies Die*, 2018).
2. Suppression of Dissent: Whistleblowers, journalists, and political opponents face persecution, as seen in countries with documented deep state influence (Assange case, Snowden revelations).
3. Policy Manipulation: National and foreign policies may serve elite interests rather than public welfare, leading to economic disparity and international conflicts (Chomsky, *Manufacturing Consent*, 1988).
4. Authoritarianism: The entrenchment of shadow governance often leads to oppressive regimes, curbing civil liberties and human rights (Diamond, *Authoritarianism Goes Global*, 2016).
Historical and Contemporary Examples of Deep State Influence
1. The United States: The Military-Industrial Complex and Intelligence Overreach*
President Dwight D. Eisenhower’s farewell address in 1961 warned against the "military-industrial complex," cautioning that defense contractors and military leaders could exert undue influence on policy. Research by John Prados (*The Ghosts of Langley*, 2017) details how the CIA has engaged in covert operations, regime changes (Iran 1953, Chile 1973), and surveillance programs (PRISM, revealed by Edward Snowden in 2013).
Testimonies from former CIA officials and NSA whistleblowers, including Snowden and William Binney, suggest that intelligence agencies operate beyond executive oversight, shaping global narratives through surveillance, propaganda, and economic interventions.
2. Turkey: The Deep State and Political Manipulation.
Turkey provides a textbook case of deep state operations. The term "Derin Devlet" (Deep State) was first used to describe clandestine networks within the Turkish military and intelligence apparatus. According to Ryan Gingeras (*Heroin, Organized Crime, and the Making of Modern Turkey*, 2014), this network engaged in assassinations, coups (1960, 1971, 1980, 1997, and 2016), and political suppression.
The 1996 Susurluk scandal exposed deep state ties between police, politicians, and organized crime. Government reports and witness testimonies from former officials, including Mehmet Agar (former Interior Minister), confirmed the state's involvement in extrajudicial killings and illegal activities.
3. Pakistan: The Military-Intelligence Nexus
Pakistan’s deep state, led by its military and Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), has been accused of controlling civilian governments and shaping foreign policy, particularly regarding India and Afghanistan (Shuja Nawaz, *Crossed Swords*, 2008).
Benazir Bhutto, the assassinated former Prime Minister, warned of ISI’s role in manipulating elections, supporting extremist groups, and undermining democratic governance. Testimonies from defectors like Lt. Gen. Asad Durrani corroborate claims that the military dictates policy, often sidelining civilian leadership.
4. Egypt: Military Dominance and Shadow Governance
Egypt’s deep state is characterized by the military’s grip over the economy and politics. The 2013 coup against President Mohamed Morsi, led by General Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, illustrated the military's determination to retain power (Springborg, *Egypt*, 2017).
Leaked audio recordings of military officials discussing election manipulation and Western diplomatic testimonies confirm that Egypt’s military-industrial elite operates independently of democratic institutions.
Scientific Studies on Deep State Phenomena
Empirical research has examined institutional corruption and covert influence within governments:
- "State Capture" Theory (Hellman et al., 2003) identifies how elites manipulate policymaking in transition economies.
- Network Analysis Studies (Domhoff, *Who Rules America?*, 2014) demonstrate how interconnected elites influence policy through think tanks, lobbying groups, and secret networks.
- Psychological Studies (Janis, *Groupthink*, 1982) reveal how decision-making bodies suppress dissent and enforce hidden agendas.
Conclusion: Addressing the Threat of the Deep State
While the probability of a deep state in any given country remains low, its existence signals a dire crisis for democratic governance. The documented cases of deep state influence in the U.S., Turkey, Pakistan, Russia, and Egypt illustrate how unaccountable power structures subvert democracy, manipulate policy, and suppress opposition.
To counteract deep state influence, transparency measures such as independent investigations, robust whistleblower protections, and stringent legislative oversight are essential. Strengthening civic engagement, investigative journalism, and academic scrutiny can also help expose and mitigate covert power networks.
A nation where unelected actors control the levers of power ceases to be a democracy. Therefore, recognizing and addressing deep state threats is not merely a political necessity but a fundamental requirement for preserving freedom, accountability, and governance integrity.
Exclusive Report: Regime Change in India - The Intersection of Global Media, Internal Anti-India Forces, and the Role of US Ambassador Eric Garcetti
The intricate dynamics surrounding the potential regime change in India are being shaped by a coordinated effort between global media propaganda and internal factions opposed to the nation’s governance. A closer examination reveals how these forces are working together, with particular reference to Eric Garcetti, the US Ambassador to India, who is seen as a key figure in this agenda.
Background: US Efforts in Bangladesh and Global Media Ecosystem
The US State Department and its embassy in Dhaka had a clear objective of deposing Sheikh Hasina, with the US Ambassador and State Department official Donald Lu playing crucial roles. Now, this approach seems to have found its template in India. The global media ecosystem, through a series of covert operations, appears to be building a similar framework aimed at influencing regime change in India.
Key questions arise: Who are the principal actors driving this anti-India media narrative? Who are the local puppets aiding this global agenda? What is their method of operation? These are the shadows we must explore.
The Hidden Agenda: A Media Workshop in Himachal Pradesh
A significant yet overlooked event was a media fact-checking workshop held in Kandbari, a village near Palampur in Himachal Pradesh’s Kangra district. This workshop, hosted on August 1st, was backed by three influential partners:
1. Factshala – India’s Media Literacy Network
2. dataLeads
3. Internews – A global non-profit organization advocating for democracy and media freedom.
At first glance, this workshop may seem like a benign event focused on promoting media literacy. However, a deeper investigation into the hosting institution—Sambhaavnaa Institute of Public Policy and Politics—unveils a trail of connections to the anti-India and anti-Hindutva leftist ecosystem.
Sambhaavnaa Institute of Public Policy and Politics: A Nexus of Leftist Ideology
The institute, founded in 2004 by Prashant Bhushan, an advocate associated with the leftist ideology, serves as a pivotal part of this larger global agenda. Despite being the founder, Prashant Bhushan’s involvement is conspicuously absent from the official website of the institute, which raises questions about transparency. The workshop held in Kandbari was not an isolated event; it is part of a broader strategy to influence public opinion and create a shift in political power within India.
The institute’s roster of contributors and workshop hosts includes several members from India’s leftist and anti-national circles. This curated list indicates that the Sambhaavnaa Institute is not just a public policy institute but rather a hub for fostering and spreading narratives that undermine India’s sovereignty and its governance.
Conclusions and Implications: A Web of Influence
The actions and networks described herein suggest that the global media ecosystem, in alliance with certain internal factions, is working systematically to destabilize India’s current regime. Through workshops, media literacy initiatives, and academic programs, these forces are strategically positioned to propagate an anti-India narrative, one that serves external interests and destabilizes the nation’s political landscape.
As the situation unfolds, it becomes essential to monitor the activities of these organizations and individuals who are silently contributing to this complex web of influence. It is only through awareness and scrutiny that the true nature of these operations can be fully understood.
A Comprehensive List of Resource People Associated with the Sambhaavnaa Institute of Public Policy and Politics.
The following individuals are listed as resource people associated with the Sambhaavnaa Institute of Public Policy and Politics, a key institution tied to the global agenda influencing India’s political landscape. Their associations, activities, and ideologies are noteworthy and represent a blend of activism and advocacy in various sectors:
1. Yogendra Yadav – Expelled from AAP, founder of AAP, and co-founder of Swaraj Abhiyan alongside Prashant Bhushan.
2. Harsh Mander – Director of the Center for Equity Studies, and founder of Project Karvan E Mohabbat.
3. Medha Patkar – Founder of the National Alliance for People’s Movement, former AAP member, recipient of the prestigious Goldman Environmental Award in 1992, the Green Ribbon Award for Best International Political Campaigner by BBC in 1995, M.A. Thomas National Human Rights Award (1999), the Human Rights Defender’s Award by Amnesty International (Germany), Deenanath Mangeshkar Award (1999), Mahatma Phule Award (1999), and the Mother Teresa Award for Social Justice (2014).
4. Akash Banerjee – YouTuber, known for the channel Bhakt Banerjee, hosted by the US Embassy in Delhi in July 2024 for a social media workshop titled “Influence to Impact.”
5. Prateek Sinha – Co-founder of Altnews.
6. Soni Sori – Naxalite activist from Chhattisgarh and winner of the Frontline Defender Award, presented by Front Line Defenders, an international human rights organization funded by the Ford Foundation and George Soros’ Open Society Foundation.
7. Nandini Rao – Activist opposing the saffronization of education.
8. Ravish Kumar – Former NDTV journalist and YouTuber.
9. Paranjoy Guha Thakurta – The only journalist mentioned in the Hindenburg report on the Adani group.
10. Thomas Franco – Former president of the All India Bankers Federation and a full-time advisor to the Center for Financial Accountability, a watchdog organization focused on projects involving Adani and Ambani.
11. Kavita Krishnan – Politburo member of the Communist Party of India (Marxist Leninist), known for promoting pro-China narratives.
12. Vijayan MJ – Secretary-General of the India chapter of the Pakistan India Peoples’ Forum for Peace and Democracy.
13. Nityanand Jayaraman – Activist opposing industrial projects.
14. Bezwada Wilson – Recipient of the Ramon Magsaysay Award (2016), senior fellow at the Ashoka Foundation, and Dalit rights activist.
15. Akash Poyam – Assistant Editor at The Karvan magazine.
16. Atreyee Mazumdar – Andrew W. Mellon Fellow at the Jackman Humanities Institute, University of Toronto, and Associate Professor of Social Sciences at the National Law School of India University, Bengaluru.
17. Madhuresh Kumar – Associated with the National Alliance for People’s Movement.
18. Vijoo Krishnan – General Secretary of the All India Kisan Sabha and a central committee member of the Communist Party of India (Marxist), a core organizer of the farmer protests.
19. Nikhil Dey – Works with the MKSS (Mazdoor Kishan Shakti Sangthan), a civil rights organization in Rajasthan.
20. Himanshu Kumar – Activist advocating for anti-Salva Judum Naxal legal aid and human rights, originally from Dantewada, Chhattisgarh, now settled in Delhi.
21. Prashant Bhushan – A prominent figure, known for his significant contributions to public policy, legal reforms, and activism.
Workshops Organized by Anti-India Factions at Sambhaavnaa Institute of Public Policy and Politics in 2024
The Sambhaavnaa Institute of Public Policy and Politics has been the venue for a number of workshops in 2024, organized by individuals and groups with notable affiliations to leftist, anti-India, and activist circles. These workshops, often focused on media, journalism, social justice, and financial matters, provide insight into the ideological inclinations of the institute’s key figures. Below is a detailed list of the workshops organized at the institution:
Workshop 1: Mobile Journalism Workshop – A New Chapter in Journalism
Date: 17-21 February 2024
Organizers:
• Naveen Kumar – Founder, Article 19 India
• Professor Karunashankar Kusuma – Head of Convergent Journalism at the Mass Communication Research Center
• Sandeep Chaudhary – Anchor-Editor, veteran of debate shows at News 24, Sahara TV, Star News, IBN7, TV 18
• Atul Chaurasia – Editor, News Laundry Hindi (Online)
• Akash Banerjee – Head of The Patriot, expert in satire, formerly with multiple media channels
• Samiratmaj Mishra – E-Journalist at BJP, AIR, Navjyoti, Haribhumi, founder and reporter at The Ground Report
• Ajay Tiwari – Former Cameraman/Video Journalist at ABP News, News Reporting, and Video Creator
Workshop 2: Jokering Justice – Intense Level of the Theatre of the Oppressed
Date: 2-7 March 2024
Organizers:
• Jaya Iyer – Former CEO of Pravah, led the establishment of the National Centre for Children and Youth at the Nehru Memorial Museum and Library
• Zubair Idrisi – Affiliated with UNICEF, Greenpeace, JAGORI, Sangat, PCI, and Teen Murti Bhawan, Nehru Learning Centre for Children
Workshop 3: Finance, Frauds & Fundamentals: Interrogating Recent Trends in India’s Financial Landscape
Date: 11-15 March 2024
Organizers:
• Paranjoy Guha Thakurta
• Anirbhan Bhattacharya
• Mayalmit Lepcha
• Priya Dharshini
• Maju Varghese
• Nancy Pathak
• Joe Athialy
• Gaurav Dwivedi
Workshop 4: Reclaiming Our Republic – Confronting Communalism
Date: 25-29 March 2024
Organizers:
• Prashant Bhushan
• Apoorvanand
• Harsh Mander
• Tehmina Arora
• Suroor Mander
• Cheryl Dsouza
• Himanshu Kumar
• Akram Akhtar
• Ziya us Salam
• Aman Wadud
Workshop 5: वज्रसूची – Social Justice Workshop
Date: 10-14 June 2024
Organizers:
• भंवर मेघवंशी
• खालिद अनीस अंसारी
• विमला विश्वप्रेमी
• सुखदेव विश्वप्रेमी
Upcoming Workshop: पड़ताल: खबरों की (Investigating the News)
Date: 16th-20th October 2024
Organizers:
• अनीश मुखर्जी – Director, AltED
• महाप्रज्ञा नायक – Lead for Source Material and Curriculum Development, AltED
• एलिया जमील – Head of Operations, AltED
• प्रतीक सिन्हा – Co-founder, Alt News
Anish Mukherjee, founder of AltEd in May 2024, was previously associated with AltNews. His initiative, AltEd, focuses on media and information literacy, with the claimed goal of promoting educational reforms. Anish is a Gandhi Fellow from the Piramal Foundation. AltEd operates as a nonprofit organization under the DMPL Learning Foundation, based in Kolkata.
These workshops demonstrate the continued association of Sambhaavnaa Institute of Public Policy and Politics with individuals and organizations holding leftist and anti-national ideologies, further underlining the role of this institution in shaping narratives that seek to challenge India’s sovereignty and governance.
Sambhaavnaa Institute of Public Policy and Politics: A Nexus of Leftist Ideologies and Anti-India Agendas
The Sambhaavnaa Institute of Public Policy and Politics has been hosting workshops since 2011. However, after 2014, a noticeable shift in the themes of these workshops points toward a clear alignment with the political agenda of opposition parties in India. This alignment is evident in the recurrent involvement of key figures from the leftist and anti-Hindutva circles, including Ravish Kumar, Akash Banerjee, Yogendra Yadav, Harsh Mander, Medha Patkar, Pratik Sinha, Soni Sori, and Kavita Krishnan, among others.
The topics of the workshops have been carefully chosen to resonate with ongoing political narratives, particularly those critical of the Modi Government. It appears that these workshops function as a breeding ground for nurturing anti-Hindutva activists and volunteers who are furthering the cause of their political backers. This was particularly evident in a workshop held on August 1st, 2024, which was supported by three key partners in the field of media literacy:
1. Factshala – India Media Literacy Network
2. dataLeads
3. Internews – A global media nonprofit promoting democracy and media freedom
Factshala, launched in 2020 in India by Internews with the support of Google.org through dataLeads, is a news and information literacy program. Its mission is to help people from small cities and villages across India critically assess online information and distinguish facts from misinformation. The Factshala Ambassador Programme is run by dataLeads in collaboration with The Poynter Institute for Media Studies, which includes their digital media literacy program MediaWise, also supported by the Google News Initiative.
The Poynter Institute itself is funded by prominent institutions, including:
• Institute for War and Peace Reporting – Run by Victoria Nuland’s sister-in-law
• John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
• National Public Radio – Funded by the US government
• The Washington Post – Known for its association with figures like Rana Ayub
Other content support comes from:
• Democracy Fund – Founded by Pierre Omidyar
• Google News Initiative
• Meta
• National Endowment for Democracy – A US government agency often referred to as a proxy for the CIA
• Microsoft
• Omidyar Network / Luminate
• TikTok
In addition to the content support, Factshala receives backing from organizations such as BBC, SMART, a non-profit based in India running Radio Mewat, and funded by entities including Omidyar Network, UNICEF, Facebook, Google, and Azim Premji University.
dataLeads, another key partner, runs several fact-checking and media literacy initiatives in India, including:
• First Check – A health and medical news fact-checking initiative
• FactShala – Political and social news fact-checking
• Kruxd – A health data provider
• Google News Initiative – A partner supporting dataLeads
• Global Data Dialogue – Focuses on AI and machine learning in media
Syed Nazakat, the founder of dataLeads, was a jury member for Google’s COVID-19 Vaccine Counter-Misinformation Open Fund (Jan 2021 - Mar 2021), which provided USD $3,000,000 for projects aiming to counter COVID-19 vaccine misinformation.
The support and funding behind these initiatives suggest a highly interconnected network of organizations and individuals with a vested interest in shaping public opinion, particularly against the current Indian government and its policies. The workshops at Sambhaavnaa Institute of Public Policy and Politics thus serve as a platform for advancing global and local left-wing ideologies under the guise of media literacy and social justice.
Internews and Its Influence on Global Media Narratives: A Critical Examination.
Internews, the organization that founded Factshala - India Media Literacy Network, claims to focus on training journalists, combating misinformation, and helping media outlets become financially sustainable. However, the real question remains: How effective is the so-called “good” it aims to achieve?
Founded in 1982 by David Hoffman, Internews is a US-based nonprofit organization that purports to promote independent media and access to information worldwide, according to its website. Yet, a deeper look at its funding sources and affiliations reveals a network of influential and often controversial backers, which raises concerns about its true motivations.
Funding Sources of Internews:
Internews is financed by numerous organizations and entities, including:
• Ford Foundation
• Democracy Fund (Pierre Omidyar)
• MacArthur Foundation
• Open Society Foundation
• Rockefeller Brothers Fund
• Rockefeller Foundation
• Rockefeller Family and Associates
• Omidyar Network
• Oak Foundation
• Skoll Global Threats Fund
These powerful financial backers are often linked to global political and social agendas, suggesting a potential bias in the narratives promoted by Internews and its associated initiatives.
Global Board of Directors:
The Global Board of Directors of Internews comprises influential figures, many of whom have connections to prominent political and human rights organizations. Some notable members include:
• Pat Mitchell – Board Member, Skoll Foundation
• Kathy Calvin – Board Member, UN Foundation
• Sach Chandaria – Sits on the boards of ERFIP, a spin-off from the Rothschilds Foundation
• Carlos Pascual – Distinguished Fellow, Atlantic Council
• Ahmed Rashid – Adviser, Human Rights Watch
• Shelley Rubin – Board Member, Human Rights Watch
• Irving Washington – Executive Fellow, Open Society Foundations
• Dennis Whittle – Former economist at the World Bank, Asian Development Bank, and USAID
• Richard J. Kessler – Former Staff Director, Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
These individuals hold key positions in organizations with significant political influence, which could sway Internews’ activities and objectives, particularly in media outreach and narrative shaping.
US Board of Directors:
The US Board of Directors features prominent figures from media and political spheres, such as:
• Arran Bardige – Journalist at The New York Times
• Kaizar Campwala – Led Al Jazeera’s entry into podcasting
• Sonal Shah – Founder, The Asian American Foundation (TAAF); an important character in understanding the connections between India and the US media ecosystem
• Matt Chanoff – Directed the Asia Program for the National Endowment for Democracy
• Simone Otus Coxe – Board Member, Human Rights Watch
• Anna Soellner – Led communications at Center for American Progress (CAP)
• Rachael Leman – Associate Vice President, U.S. Advocacy, CARE
• Ben Rader – General Counsel, Goldman Sachs Foundation (notably linked to Medha Patkar, the winner of the Goldman Sachs Environment Prize, often considered the “Nobel Prize” of climate activism)
• John Montgomery – Served on the Internet Steering Committee of the World Economic Forum (WEF)
These individuals, many of whom have ties to US political entities and advocacy organizations, play crucial roles in shaping media strategies and public perception on a global scale.
UK Board of Directors:
The UK Board of Directors includes influential figures such as:
• Chanpreet Arora – VP and Business Head, VOOT
• Wolfgang Blau – Co-founder, Oxford Climate Journalism Network
• Dr. Richard Danbury – BBC’s Advanced Law Trainer
• Kevin J. Delaney – Managing Editor, WSJ.com
• Kristina Henschen – Worked with SIDA and UNDP
• Ẹniọlá Ṣóyẹmí – Worked at Chatham House
These members further extend the global reach and influence of Internews, ensuring a broad alignment with both media and policy networks.
Internews Global Management:
The global management team of Internews includes key figures such as:
• Jeanne Bourgault – President and CEO, Internews; formerly with USAID
• Meera Selva – CEO, Europe, Internews; member of the Center for Economic Policy Research, funded by Ford Foundation, Open Society Foundation, and Omidyar Network
• Robyn Mordeno – Chief Financial Officer, Internews; previously CFO for the Institute for War & Peace Reporting (IWPR), managed by the family of Victoria Nuland, a key figure in US regime change efforts
• Brian D. Hanley – Regional Director, Asia-Pacific Programs, Internews; served as Senior Democracy and Governance Field Advisor at USAID
• James Fahn – Executive Director, Earth Journalism Network; formerly worked for the Ford Foundation in environmental and development programs
This leadership team, with extensive experience in media, governance, and international development, demonstrates Internews’ strong links to influential political and financial organizations.
In conclusion, Internews, through its Factshala initiative, operates in a highly interconnected global ecosystem of media organizations, non-profits, and political entities that influence media narratives worldwide. The backing of major foundations and corporate interests, along with the leadership’s connections to political and advocacy groups, raises important questions about the true motivations behind its media literacy efforts and the content it promotes.
A Deep Dive into the Interconnections of Global Media, Politics, and Philanthropy
David Hoffman is also the founder of the Global Forum for Media Development (GFMD), an organization that claims to be the largest global community focused on media development, media freedom, and journalism support. As per its website, GFMD’s mission is to create, promote, and deliver policies and programs that sustain journalism as a public good. The organization asserts that its network of 191 member organizations and various partners work together through collaboration and collective action to advance this cause.
However, the financial backing of GFMD comes from a range of organizations, many of which are associated with powerful political and corporate interests. These include:
• The Asia Foundation
• Skoll Foundation
• Rockefeller Brothers Fund
• Open Society Foundations
• Oak Foundation
• Pulitzer Centre
• Park Foundation
• Media Democracy Fund
• MacArthur Foundation
• Luminate - Omidyar Network
• Humanity United - Omidyar Network
• Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
• United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
• US Department of State – Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor Affairs (DRL)
• United Nations Development Program (UNDP)
• Facebook Journalism Project
• Google News Initiative
The Asia Foundation’s influence in the Indian subcontinent sheds light on its broader objectives. The Asia Foundation itself is funded by major organizations such as:
• Henry Luce Foundation
• Ford Foundation
• Ebay Foundation
• US Chamber of Commerce
Looking at the management of the Asia Foundation in the Indian subcontinent, it becomes evident that the foundation has strong ties to US government initiatives. Its representatives in the region have close associations with USAID, the US State Department, and international organizations with similar goals.
Notable members of the Asia Foundation’s subcontinental management include:
• Abdullah Ahmadzai – Country Representative for Afghanistan, associated with the International Foundation for Electoral Services (funded by USAID and the US State Department).
• Nandita Baruah – Country Representative for India, who previously worked with USAID India as a regional anti-trafficking and gender specialist.
• Meghan Nalbo – Country Representative for Nepal, who served as the director of the Democracy and Governance office at USAID Nepal.
• Kazi Faisal Bin Seraj – Country Representative for Bangladesh, affiliated with the Aspen Institute.
• Muzaffar Ud Din – Country Representative for Pakistan, who has worked for UNDP and was previously the country director for BRAC International in Afghanistan.
Furthermore, the Global Forum for Media Development (GFMD) has significant representation from influential figures such as Owais Aslam Ali from Pakistan, who serves as the Secretary General and leads the Pakistan Press Foundation. This suggests a concerted effort to influence media development globally, particularly in the South Asian context.
Sonal Shah’s Role in Global Media and Political Ecosystems
In the previous discussions, we explored Sonal Shah, who is currently the president of The Asian American Foundation (TAAF). Shah has a distinguished political background, having worked as the national policy director for Pete Buttigieg’s 2020 presidential campaign and as the Director of the Office of Social Innovation and Civic Participation within the Obama Administration. Shah’s family hails from Mumbai, India, and she is deeply connected to the US political ecosystem, holding positions on several boards, including those of Oxfam America and the Century Foundation.
Founded on May 3, 2021, The Asian American Foundation (TAAF) is the largest philanthropic effort dedicated to Asian Americans in the US, boasting over $125 million in funds. However, TAAF is also fiscally sponsored by the New Venture Fund, managed by Arabella Advisors—a consulting firm that controls a multi-billion-dollar “dark money” network linked to notable figures such as George Soros and Hansjörg Wyss, a Swiss billionaire whose father was once employed by Klaus Schwab’s father during the Nazi era.
TAAF’s Influential Backing
TAAF’s launch garnered significant attention, with video remarks from former Presidents Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and Barack Obama. Shortly after, the foundation was invited to meet with President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris at the White House. Shah’s ability to raise over $100 million in donations prior to the foundation’s official launch speaks to her influential role in shaping political and media narratives.
The Interwoven Network: Eric Garcetti and Global Political Strategy
Sonal Shah is also part of the Advisory Council of the Accelerator for America (AFA), a think tank founded by Eric Garcetti, the current US Ambassador to India. The AFA is funded by the Clinton Foundation and the Ford Foundation, and its funding flows through three pass-through nonprofit organizations: the New World Foundation, North America’s Building Trade Union, and the American Federation of Labour and Industrial Organization.
Garcetti’s work extends into the World Mayors’ Council for Climate Action, which is chaired by Sadiq Khan, the Mayor of London, a known George Soros protégé. Interestingly, several members of the Clinton Foundation board, such as Cheryl Mills and Robert S. Harrison, are also involved with major financial entities, including BlackRockand the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).
Furthermore, the Clinton Climate Initiative, a key player in the C40 group, works on climate action through initiatives like the 15-minute city concept. This initiative is supported by Open Society Foundations, Laudes Foundation, Climateworks Foundation, and others, creating a global push towards sustainability and climate change action.
The Complex Web of Global Media, Political Narratives, and Influence.
The connections between influential figures like Sonal Shah, Eric Garcetti, and the financial and political networks they represent highlight the complex web of global media and political influence. Organizations such as TAAF, Internews, and GFMD are interconnected through funding, leadership, and goals, all of which influence media narratives, public policy, and global governance. These players shape the global discourse on democracy, media freedom, and climate change, ensuring that their interests are promoted across borders.
A Network of Global Influence
An essential figure in this narrative is Vandana Shiva, a panelist at the Clinton Global Initiative and the founder of Navdanya, an organization focused on promoting biodiversity and organic farming. Vandana Shiva is closely associated with Bill McKibben, a climate activist and founder of the non-profit 350.org, known for organizing global climate marches. 350.org itself is funded by influential entities such as the Open Society Foundation and the Tides Foundation, both of which also contribute to Navdanya, Shiva’s foundation.
Vandana Shiva has positioned herself as a leading voice in the Non-GMO (NTI GMO) movement in India. However, in 2014, Shiva, along with her activist colleagues Aruna Rodrigues (who filed India’s first anti-GMO court case) and Kavita Kurugati of the Sambhaavnaa Institute (affiliated with Prashant Bhushan), issued an open letter condemning a raid on Shiva’s office by India’s Intelligence Bureau (IB). They argued that the raid was backed by foreign powers aiming to undermine India’s food security. Notably, Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors—which funds The Asia Foundation, a project of Sonal Shah (a US Board Member of Internews, a global media nonprofit)—is also linked to organizations driving global narratives about food security and development in India.
One of the board members of Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors is Vineet Rishi, who heads the Oak Foundation in India and serves as an advisor to the Global President of Oak Foundation. Additionally, Rishi is also a member of the Swiss Philanthropy Foundation, which collaborates with various philanthropic organizations such as Laudes Foundation, Open Society Foundation, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
The Laudes Foundation is a partner of Future Earth, a climate action think tank led by Paul Shrivastava, the President of the Club of Rome. It is important to note that Anand Shah, the brother of Sonal Shah (founder of The Asian American Foundation), is also a member of the Club of Rome, further solidifying the interconnectedness of this global network.
A Network of Powerful Partnerships
A deeper look at these organizations reveals how their interconnected efforts advance their political and ideological agendas. Vineet Rishi, as mentioned earlier, oversees the Oak Foundation India, which funds organizations like Aangan. The founder of Aangan, Suparna Gupta, is on the board of Dasra, a Mumbai-based NGO. Interestingly, Dasra is funded by several prominent donors, including Tata Trusts, Azim Premji University, and the Omidyar Network—the latter being a prominent backer of various international initiatives, including regime change efforts.
In addition, Dasra receives funding from AVPN (the Asian Venture Philanthropy Network), which is supported by the Rockefeller Foundation and Rohini Nilekani Philanthropies—further solidifying the links between the global elite and local philanthropic efforts.
Moreover, Future Earth, a key climate action think tank, is funded by START—a nonprofit organization that, in turn, receives backing from USAID, Oxfam, and IIHS (Indian Institute of Human Settlements), a Bangalore-based organization that plays a central role in shaping narratives about India’s development. IIHS, led by Aromar Ravi, a former advisor to the UPA Government, is deeply involved in shaping public opinion around India’s social and industrial development. Ravi’s tenure during the Andhra-Telangana partition and his association with the UN Sustainable Development Social Network further tie him to global efforts to influence India’s policy directions, particularly in the context of the Global Happiness Index, where India is ranked lower than neighboring nations like Pakistan and Bangladesh.
Aromar Ravi’s connection to the Ashoka Foundation and his role in producing the Global Happiness Index raises questions about the accuracy and motivations behind these rankings, particularly when they are used to target specific political agendas within India. By consistently placing India below countries like Pakistan and Bangladesh, these indices provide ammunition for opposition parties, such as the Congress Party, to criticize the current Modi Government.
SEWA Bharat and Its Global Connections
Another layer of this complex web involves SEWA Bharat, an NGO founded by Ellaben Bhatt, a longtime associate of Hillary Clinton. When Clinton visited India, she made a point of visiting the SEWA Bharat office in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, where she launched a $50 million female empowerment initiative in collaboration with the NGO. SEWA Bharat is also linked to Mirai Chatterjee, its current chairperson, who sits on the board of the Schwab Foundation, founded by Hilde Schwab, the wife of World Economic Forum (WEF) founder Klaus Schwab.
SEWA Bharat is heavily funded by various international organizations, including:
• UNDP
• USAID
• Ford Foundation
• Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
• Freedom Fund
The Freedom Fund, which supports SEWA Bharat, is managed through several founding nonprofits, one of which is the Legatum Foundation. Legatum maintains a pass-through endowment fund called the End Fund, which receives backing from the US State Department, alongside other significant contributors like Mackenzie Scott and Jeffrey Rothschild.
These global organizations, through their interconnected funding and influence, weave a complex narrative that links climate action, social justice, and media development initiatives. The involvement of powerful philanthropies such as the Rockefeller Foundation, Open Society Foundation, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation shows how their resources shape global policy, often with significant implications for countries like India.
Through these intricate networks of funding and partnerships, these organizations shape political discourse, media narratives, and global initiatives that impact everything from food security and climate action to social justice and media freedom. The influence of this “deep state” network is particularly evident in how they manipulate global indices, support regime change efforts, and push for policies that align with their ideological and political objectives.
The Complex Web of Philanthropy, Health, and Media Influence
In examining the relationships within influential philanthropic and media networks, one must look closely at organizations like the Indian Institute of Human Settlements (IIHS), founded by individuals with ties to global philanthropic and political entities. A key figure in this network is Rohini Nilekani, one of the founders of IIHS. Nilekani is also a board member of the Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and Environment, an organization with a diverse and influential group of trustees.
While being a board member in such organizations is not inherently problematic, it is crucial to understand the broader implications when examining the other members of the Ashoka Trust’s board:
1. Darshan Shankar, Vice Chancellor of the University of Trans-Disciplinary Health Sciences and Technology—an institution that has ties to Sam Pitroda, a trustee and an advocate for the Foundation for Revitalization of Local Health Traditions (FRLHT), the parent body of the university.
2. Ravi Venkatesan, a business leader and social entrepreneur, is also a board member of the Rockefeller Foundation, one of the most powerful philanthropic organizations in the world.
3. Shruti Shibulal, a World Economic Forum (WEF) Young Global Leader (2017) and daughter of Infosys founder SD Shibulal, brings a strong connection to the world of global business and technology.
In fact, SD Shibulal is also a board member of the Foundation for Revitalization of Local Health Traditions (FRLHT), further linking the Ashoka Trust with influential global networks. Additionally, Rohini Nilekani is listed as a funding partner of FRLHT, which is connected to Sonal Shah, a member of Internews’ US Board—a global media nonprofit that wields considerable political influence.
Funding Networks of Key Organizations
One of the significant organizations associated with SEWA Bharat is WIEGO (Women in Informal Employment: Globalizing and Organizing), which receives substantial funding from a range of powerful global organizations, including:
• SIDA
• Rockefeller Foundation
• Open Society Foundation
• Commonwealth Foundation
• Department for International Development, UK (DFID)
• USAID
The inclusion of USAID as a frequent funding partner raises questions about the influence and objectives of these organizations, especially in the context of global governance and media narratives.
Notable Figures in Global Foundations and Media
Among the individuals connected to WIEGO is Shem Ochola OGW, Deputy Director General at the Commonwealth Foundation, who previously worked as a trade manager at the Pakistan High Commission in Nairobi, Kenya. This individual’s trajectory further reveals the global nature of the networks that drive philanthropic and political agendas.
When you consider the broader question of the US Ambassador to India, Eric Garcetti’s role, it is essential to question what he may be trying to accomplish with his involvement in various networks. USAID’s presence across numerous NGO and nonprofit sectors raises questions about the agency’s role in shaping global development, especially considering its ubiquitous presence in the funding sections of major organizations and its historical ties to U.S. foreign policy.
The Influence of USAID and Global Networks in Media
The significant involvement of USAID in funding partners across NGOs, media nonprofits like Internews and the Global Forum for Media Development (GFMD), and Human Rights Councils—many of which are funded by George Soros—suggests a coordinated effort to influence global media narratives and policy decisions. As observed, both Internews and GFMD are two of the foremost media nonprofits, with immense political clout and networking capabilities across the globe. Their operations are supported by vast financial resources, embedding them deeply within the social and political landscape of virtually every country.
This intricate web of connections, funding, and influence demonstrates the operational mechanics of what is commonly referred to as the “deep state.” Through strategic investments, the deep state seeks to manipulate narratives, sway political agendas, and influence global media, often with the goal of promoting specific political, social, and economic outcomes on a global scale.
Ultimately, understanding the interconnectedness of global philanthropy, media influence, and political power provides insight into how deeply entrenched networks of influence shape the direction of global policy and public opinion. The influence exerted by these organizations and individuals extends far beyond charity work, reaching into the very heart of political decision-making, social justice movements, and media narratives around the world.
Tackling the influence of powerful global networks, particularly in the context of media, philanthropy, and political governance, requires a nuanced approach that integrates transparency, accountability, and civic engagement. The following strategies, backed by scientific references and evidence, can serve as the foundation for addressing these complex dynamics.
1. Enhance Transparency and Accountability
• Demand Transparency: Transparency in funding sources and organizational goals is critical to understanding the potential biases influencing actions. According to a study by Michel and McLean (2016) on nonprofit organizations, transparency is key to building trust with the public and ensuring accountability (Michel, M., & McLean, D. M. (2016). Nonprofit Governance: A Handbook for Public Policy Makers. Public Administration Review, 76(3), 450-460). A lack of transparency can enable vested interests to manipulate narratives without public scrutiny.
• Independent Oversight Mechanisms: Independent oversight bodies play a crucial role in ensuring that organizations adhere to ethical practices. Evidence shows that when independent regulatory bodies oversee nonprofit activities, accountability improves (Sargeant, A., & Shang, J. (2011). Fundraising and Nonprofit Accountability: Does Transparency Increase Charitable Giving? Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 22(4), 481-503). Such regulatory bodies could oversee the activities of organizations like the Global Forum for Media Development and Internews, ensuring their independence from undue influence.
2. Promote Independent Media and Critical Journalism
• Support Independent Media: Independent media outlets act as a counterbalance to powerful interest groups that may control mainstream narratives. According to Curran and Seaton (2010), the role of independent media is vital for a healthy democracy, as it enables the public to make informed decisions (Curran, J., & Seaton, J. (2010). Power Without Responsibility: The Press, Broadcasting, and New Media in Britain. Routledge).
• Media Literacy: Media literacy is essential in helping individuals critically engage with media content. Studies have shown that individuals who are media literate are more likely to question the biases in media coverage and less susceptible to misinformation (Leeds, R. (2015). Media Literacy and the Impact of Media on Political Attitudes. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 7(1), 18-30). As such, fostering media literacy through education and training can significantly reduce the power of biased media narratives.
3. Strengthen Civil Society and Grassroots Movements
• Grassroots Movements: Empowering grassroots organizations is crucial for ensuring that local voices are heard. Fisher (2010) argues that grassroots movements are instrumental in challenging the dominance of powerful political and economic elites (Fisher, W. (2010). The Politics of Civil Society: The Struggle for Political Voice. Yale University Press). Civil society organizations can work to increase accountability within both local and global governance structures.
• Empowering Local Organizations: Evidence shows that local, independent nonprofits often outperform larger, foreign-funded organizations in achieving community-driven goals (Woolcock, M. (2013). The Role of Social Capital in Development: An Empirical Assessment. Theory and Society, 32(1), 151-208). By increasing the autonomy of these local organizations, communities are better equipped to resist outside manipulation.
4. Increase Political and Economic Sovereignty
• Advocate for Domestic Self-Reliance: Reducing dependency on foreign aid and external financial influence is key to protecting national sovereignty. Easterly (2006) emphasizes that aid often serves the interests of donor countries rather than the needs of the recipient nations, and countries that rely heavily on foreign aid are more vulnerable to external influence (Easterly, W. (2006). The White Man’s Burden: Why the West’s Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done So Much Ill and So Little Good. Penguin Press).
• Alternative Funding Models: Research supports the idea that alternative funding mechanisms, such as community-based fundraising and small donor contributions, reduce the risk of external manipulation (Kang, M. (2012). The Effects of Funding on Nonprofit Behavior: A Study of Donor-Driven Change. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(1), 12-28). These models allow organizations to retain greater autonomy over their missions.
5. Engage in Global Networks for Change
• Participate in Global Forums: Engaging in global networks can allow for a broader exchange of ideas and strategies for governance reform. According to Keohane (2005), global forums facilitate the exchange of information and can serve as platforms for advocating for greater global equity (Keohane, R. O. (2005). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton University Press). By participating in such forums, individuals and organizations can advocate for greater transparency in international policy-making.
6. Advocate for Reform in Global Governance
• Advocate for Reform in International Organizations: According to Chandrasekhar (2013), reforming international organizations such as the UN and the World Bank to make them more democratically accountable is critical for reducing the concentration of power among a small group of nations (Chandrasekhar, C. P. (2013). The Political Economy of the UN and the World Bank: Reforming Global Institutions. Economic and Political Weekly, 48(18), 35-47). These reforms would ensure that decisions made at the global level reflect the interests of a more diverse and representative set of countries and populations.
7. Educate and Mobilize the Public
• Public Education: According to Bennett (2003), the public’s understanding of how political and economic elites interact with media is essential for a functioning democracy (Bennett, W. L. (2003). New Media Power: The Internet and Global Activism. Studies in Communication and Politics). Public education on these issues can help citizens recognize and resist manipulation from powerful global networks.
• Use Digital Tools for Advocacy: Digital platforms have been shown to amplify voices and enable widespread mobilization (Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. Yale University Press). These tools can be used to spread awareness and mobilize individuals to resist the undue influence of powerful political and financial networks.
8. Hold Governments Accountable
• Accountability in Governance: Ensuring that governments are held accountable for their actions is crucial in reducing foreign influence over domestic politics. Miller (2010) argues that accountable governance is key to building public trust and ensuring that political decisions reflect the will of the people (Miller, D. (2010). The Ethics of Political Engagement. Political Studies, 58(4), 675-691).
• Foreign Influence Laws: Strengthening laws governing foreign influence can limit the ability of external organizations to manipulate domestic politics. Lustgarten (2017) finds that political transparency laws can help mitigate the impact of foreign influence (Lustgarten, A. (2017). Foreign Influence and Political Transparency: The Role of Political Action Committees in U.S. Elections. American Political Science Review, 111(1), 128-144).
The term “Deep State”
The term “Deep State” has been used to describe a form of government that operates behind the scenes, beyond the official structure of elected officials and public institutions. This term often refers to a network of influential actors, including military leaders, intelligence agencies, bureaucrats, and private actors, who shape political decisions without public scrutiny or oversight. While some view the deep state as a conspiratorial idea, there is significant evidence, both scientific and historical, that suggests powerful, unelected networks can and do exert considerable influence on policy and governance.
The concept of the deep state can be traced back to political science and theories of governance, where scholars have pointed out the influence of bureaucratic elites and military establishments on state decisions. According to Michel Foucault in Discipline and Punish (1975), power within modern states is decentralized and operates at multiple levels, often outside of the immediate political sphere. Foucault’s concept of “biopower” implies that control over populations is exerted not only through laws but through various other institutions such as military, healthcare, and education systems, suggesting a more intricate and covert form of governance. This kind of decentralized power can sometimes take the form of what is often referred to as the deep state.
Scientific research has explored how such networks can manifest in governance. One study by Machiavelli in The Prince (1513) posited that rulers are often beholden to powerful institutions like the military or wealthy elites, who may not be subject to direct political processes. This influence can be seen in modern societies through the way economic policies are shaped by multinational corporations and lobbying groups, often to the detriment of public welfare. The military-industrial complex, as warned by President Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1961, exemplifies this hidden power. The military and defense contractors in the U.S., for example, have historically exerted disproportionate influence over foreign policy decisions, especially during the Cold War, regardless of the electoral process.
In more recent studies, scholars like Peter B. Evans in Embedded Autonomy (1995) demonstrate how state elites form close relationships with businesses, creating an “embedded” form of authority that sometimes sidelines democratic processes. These relationships often perpetuate self-interest and economic policies that favor a select few rather than the public good. Further, the idea of the “Deep State” is echoed in David Graeber’s Debt: The First 5,000 Years(2011), where he argues that powerful financial interests, through central banks and international financial institutions like the IMF, shape not only the economic structure but also the political decisions of countries, often without the consent of the governed.
Scientific evidence has also highlighted the role of intelligence agencies in shaping public discourse and government policy. The CIA, for example, has been involved in covert operations worldwide that align with national interests, often bypassing public accountability mechanisms. A study by Christopher Paul in Strategic Communication and Public Diplomacy (2011) argues that intelligence agencies and think tanks serve as key players in shaping narratives, controlling information, and influencing decision-making.
While the term “Deep State” often carries conspiratorial connotations, it is crucial to recognize that the concept reflects a legitimate concern about the concentration of power within unelected, influential entities. These networks, acting both domestically and internationally, influence policy decisions and the broader social, economic, and political landscape. The scientific and historical evidence suggests that these covert structures of power are not only a reality but are a pervasive part of modern governance, even if their operations are hidden from public view. The challenge, therefore, lies in ensuring greater transparency, accountability, and public involvement in decision-making to prevent such powerful, unelected networks from exercising unchecked influence.
Conclusion: Unraveling the Complex Web of Global Influence
Throughout this discussion, we’ve explored the intricate relationships between influential individuals, global organizations, and their interconnected influence on global policy, media narratives, and philanthropy. At the heart of this web are various networks of nonprofits, foundations, and key political figures, whose operations often span across borders and deeply impact global social, political, and economic landscapes.
The Global Forum for Media Development (GFMD) and Internews stand as prominent examples of powerful media nonprofits supported by an array of influential foundations, including those tied to the U.S. government, George Soros, and other major philanthropic bodies. These organizations play significant roles in shaping public opinion, policy agendas, and narratives that affect countries worldwide, with their reach expanding through strategic partnerships, funding, and influence over media channels and democratic institutions.
We also delved into how individuals like Sonal Shah, Rohini Nilekani, Anand Shah, and Vandana Shiva are connected to various influential organizations and philanthropic initiatives. These connections, in turn, lead to deeper questions about the motives and goals behind their support and affiliations, especially considering the political and social outcomes that follow.
The role of organizations like USAID, Open Society Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation, and Ford Foundation in funding a large number of these initiatives demonstrates a centralized influence that often blurs the line between charitable giving and political maneuvering. These organizations’ influence over media narratives, health policies, climate change initiatives, and global development cannot be understated.
At the core of this narrative is a complex network of power and influence that often aligns with specific political and ideological agendas, facilitating the advancement of particular global agendas—whether it be in the realm of climate activism, social justice, economic reform, or media freedom. The strategies employed by these influential bodies highlight a sophisticated system of governance and influence that transcends traditional political borders, making it crucial for citizens and nations to critically examine the dynamics at play.
This analysis ultimately reveals the extent to which global power structures shape not just the political landscape, but also the narratives that define our understanding of democracy, justice, and global cooperation. The interconnectedness of political, media, and philanthropic forces offers a compelling, if sometimes troubling, portrait of how decisions at the highest levels impact individuals and societies around the world.
Comentários